Pola Pemanfaatan Generative AI Oleh Mahasiswa Dalam Penyelesaian Tugas Akademik Berdasarkan Data Deklarasi AI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53696/venn.v5i4.636Keywords:
Generative AI, AI Declaration, Higher Education, AI Literacy, Academic IntegrityAbstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI) has become increasingly integrated into higher education, creating opportunities for improving learning processes while raising concerns regarding academic integrity and responsible technology use. This study aims to identify patterns of generative AI utilization among students in completing academic assignments based on AI declaration data. A mixed-methods approach was employed involving 44 students from the Chemistry Education Program enrolled in the Kajian Kurikulum Kimia SMK course. Quantitative data were analyzed using frequency and percentage analysis, while qualitative responses were examined through content analysis. The findings indicate that most students used AI in a limited manner (86.4%), primarily for brainstorming ideas (77.3%), understanding concepts (70.5%), and developing writing frameworks (47.7%). ChatGPT was the most frequently used platform (93.2%), followed by Google Gemini (45.5%) and Canva AI (29.5%). Students generally utilized AI as a supporting tool rather than a replacement for independent work, demonstrated by their efforts to adapt AI-generated outputs to course contexts (65.9%), develop additional content (56.8%), and verify information using academic sources (93.2%). However, some students still showed potential risks related to dependency and insufficiently detailed AI interaction strategies. This study concludes that AI declaration forms can serve as valuable instruments for understanding actual AI usage patterns and promoting transparent, ethical, and responsible AI integration in higher education.
Downloads
References
Ajalo, E., Mukunya, D., Nantale, R., Kayemba, F., Pangholi, K., Babuya, J., Akuu, S. L., Namiiro, A. M., Nsubuga, Y., Mpagi, J., Musaba, M. W., Oguttu, F., Kuteesa, J., Mubuuke, A. G., Munabi, I., & Kiguli, S. (2025). Widespread use of ChatGPT and other Artificial Intelligence tools among medical students in Uganda: A cross-sectional study. PLOS ONE, 20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313776
Bahroun, Z., Anane, C., Ahmed, V., & Zacca, A. (2023). Transforming Education: A Comprehensive Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational Settings through Bibliometric and Content Analysis. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712983.
Black, R. W., & Tomlinson, B. (2025). University students describe how they adopt AI for writing and research in a general education course. Scientific Reports, 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92937-2
Chan, C., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Cheng, A., Calhoun, A., & Reedy, G. (2025). Artificial intelligence-assisted academic writing: recommendations for ethical use. Advances in Simulation, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00350-6
Chubb, J., Cowling, P., & Reed, D. (2021). Speeding up to keep up: exploring the use of AI in the research process. Ai & Society, 37, 1439 - 1457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01259-0
Chu, K.-Y., & Chiu, P. (2025). Prompt Design and AI Response Quality in University Students’ Academic Learning Tasks. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 62. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1417
Combrinck, C., & Loubser, N. (2025). Student self-reflection as a tool for managing GenAI use in large class assessment. Discover Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00461-2
Dabis, A., & Csáki, C. (2024). AI and ethics: Investigating the first policy responses of higher education institutions to the challenge of generative AI. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03526-z
Deep, P. D., & Chen, Y. (2025). The Role of AI in Academic Writing: Impacts on Writing Skills, Critical Thinking, and Integrity in Higher Education. Societies. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15090247
De Souza, M. G., Won, M., Treagust, D., & Serrano, A. (2024). Visualising relativity: assessing high school students’ understanding of complex physics concepts through AI-generated images. Physics Education, 59. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ad1e71
Fathi, T. E., Saad, A., Larhzil, H., Lamri, D., & Ibrahmi, E. M. A. (2025). Integrating generative AI into STEM education: enhancing conceptual understanding, addressing misconceptions, and assessing student acceptance. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-025-00125-z
Forlales, A. L., & Villanueva, E. (2025). Exploring Master’s Students' Paraphrasing and Synthesis Techniques: A Comparative Analysis with AI-Based Text Generation. Romblon State University Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.58780/rsurj.v7i1.229
Gonsalves, C. (2024). Addressing student non-compliance in AI use declarations: implications for academic integrity and assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50, 592 - 606. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2415654
Güner, H., & Er, E. (2025). AI in the classroom: Exploring students’ interaction with ChatGPT in programming learning. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 12681 - 12707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13337-7
Haroud, S., & Saqri, N. (2025). Generative AI in Higher Education: Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives on Support, Replacement, and Digital Literacy. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040396.
Ivanov, S., Soliman, M., Tuomi, A., Alkathiri, N., & Al-Alawi, A. N. (2024). Drivers of generative AI adoption in higher education through the lens of the theory of planned behaviour. Technology in Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102521
Johnston, H., Wells, R. F., Shanks, E. M., Boey, T., & Parsons, B. N. (2024). Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00149-4
Kayalı, B., Yavuz, M., Balat, Ş., & Çalışan, M. (2023). Investigation of student experiences with ChatGPT-supported online learning applications in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8915
Khlaif, Z. N., Ayyoub, A., Hamamra, B., Bensalem, E., Mitwally, M., Ayyoub, A., Hattab, M., & Shadid, F. (2024). University Teachers’ Views on the Adoption and Integration of Generative AI Tools for Student Assessment in Higher Education. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101090
Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., & Li, N. (2024). Exploring students’ perspectives on Generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 1265 - 1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7
Kim, J., Klopfer, M., Grohs, J. R., Eldardiry, H., Weichert, J., Cox, L., & Pike, D. (2025). Examining Faculty and Student Perceptions of Generative AI in University Courses. Innovative Higher Education, 50, 1281 - 1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09774-w.
Knoth, N., Tolzin, A., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. (2024). AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., 6, 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225
Lund, B. D., Mannuru, N. R., Teel, Z. A., Lee, T. H., Ortega, N. J., Simmons, S., & Ward, E. (2025). Student Perceptions of AI-Assisted Writing and Academic Integrity: Ethical Concerns, Academic Misconduct, and Use of Generative AI in Higher Education. AI in Education. https://doi.org/10.3390/aieduc1010002
Mollel, G. (2025). Determinants of AI Utilization among Tanzania Higher Learning Students: Examining Trends, Predictors, and Academic Applications. East African Journal of Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajit.8.1.2838
Morell-Mengual, V., Fernández-García, O., Berenguer, C., Ortega-Barón, J., Gil-Llario, M., & Estruch-García, V. (2025). Characteristics, motivations and attitudes of students using ChatGPT and other language model-based chatbots in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 22257 - 22274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13650-1
Mulaudzi, L., & Hamilton, J. (2025). Lecturer’s Perspective on the Role of AI in Personalized Learning: Benefits, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations in Higher Education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23, 1571 - 1591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09615-1
Pallant, J., Blijlevens, J., Campbell, A., & Jopp, R. (2025). Mastering knowledge: the impact of generative AI on student learning outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 51, 714 - 735. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2025.2487570
Schryen, G., Marrone, M., & Yang, J. (2025). Exploring the scope of generative AI in literature review development. Electronic Markets, 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-025-00754-2
Shehri, F. A., Maham, R., Malik, A., & Saif, O. B. (2023). Effects of ChatGPT on Students Academic Performance:Mediating Role of Prompt Engineering. The Asian Bulletin of Big Data Management. https://doi.org/10.62019/abbdm.v3i2.58
Shukla, P., Naik, S., Obi, I., Backus, J., Rasche, N., & Parsons, P. C. (2025). Rethinking Citation of AI Sources in Student-AI Collaboration within HCI Design Education. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Symposium on HCI Education. https://doi.org/10.1145/3742901.3742909
Söllner, M., Arnold, T., Benlian, A., Bretschneider, U., Knight, C., Ohly, S., Rudkowski, L., Schreiber, G., & Wendt, D. (2025). ChatGPT and Beyond: Exploring the Responsible Use of Generative AI in the Workplace. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 67, 289 - 303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-025-00932-8
Strzelecki, A., & ElArabawy, S. (2024). Investigation of the moderation effect of gender and study level on the acceptance and use of generative AI by higher education students: Comparative evidence from Poland and Egypt. Br. J. Educ. Technol., 55, 1209-1230. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13425
Ursavaş, Ö. F., Yalçın, Y., Islamoglu, H., Bakır-Yalçın, E., & Cukurova, M. (2025). Rethinking the importance of social norms in generative AI adoption: investigating the acceptance and use of generative AI among higher education students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00535-z
Yavich, R. (2025). Will the Use of AI Undermine Students Independent Thinking?. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060669
Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., & Román-González, M. (2024). Generative AI and the future of higher education: a threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dewiyanti Fadly, Halimah Husain, Dedy Setyawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors certify that:
- if the manuscript is co-authored, they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- the work described has not been formally published before in a registered ISSN or ISBN media, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis.
- it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- they secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere (it does not infringe on the rights of others).
- they agree to the license and copyright agreement.
All articles published are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
- Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
