Analisis Proses Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Dalam Mensketsa Luas Daerah Di Bawah Kurva
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53696/2964-867X.56Keywords:
Problem Solving, Think AloudAbstract
This study aims to analyze the problem solving process of high school students in sketching the integral area under the curve. This research was conducted at SMAN 6 Luwu Timur, South Sulawesi Province. The research method used in this method is a qualitative method using a descriptive approach. The conclusion in this study was that on the engagement indicator it was found that there were students who identified thoroughly and there were also students who only partially identified and there were also students who identified internally. As for the transformation-formulation indicator, it was found that there were students who made initial guesses by using the integral concept first and then guessed the critical points needed to sketch the graph. However, there are also students who make initial guesses by determining the critical points needed to draw the graph first and then in the next guess using the definite integral concept. However, there are also students who only make guesses by guessing critical points by utilizing the available information to sketch graphs. For the implementation indicators, it was found that there were students who formulated the graph first, then created the shaded area of the graph, followed by the calculation phase. Then there are students who only finish at the graph formulation stage making shaded areas on the graph, but do not continue at the calculation phase.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, A.M. (2019). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Matematika pada Materi Integral Luas Daerah di Bawah Kurva dan Volume Benda Putar. An-Nahdhah, 12(1), 159-176.
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A. Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addision Wesley Longman, Inc.
Annizar, A. M. R., Maulyda, M. A., Khairunnisa, G. F., & Hijriani, L. (2020). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal PISA pada Topik Geometri. Jurnal Elemen, 6(1), 39-55.
Ashari, N. W., Muhammad, I., & Halim, R. F. (2020). Pengaruh Kecerdasan Emosional Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Proximal: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 16-23.
Ashari, N. W., & Salwah, S. (2017). Problem based learning (PBL) dalam meningkatkan kecakapan pembuktian matematis mahasiswa calon guru. JMPM: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 100-109.
Aryworo. (2011). Mengajar Struktur Matematika Bruner. http://aryworo.blogspot.com/2011/08/mengajar-struktur-matematika-bruner-dan_20.html?m=1. Diakses 9 Maret 2015.
Creswell, J. W. 2012. Educational Research Fourth Edition. Boston: Pearson education, Inc.
Fiorentika, K., Santoso, D. B., & Simon, I. M. 2016). Keefektifan teknik self-instruction untuk meningkatkan kepercayaan diri siswa SMP. Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling, 1(3), 104-111.
Haji, S. (2008). Menuju Tahap Keseimbangan (Ekuilibrium) Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika SMP.
Hobri, H., Tussolikha, D., & Oktavianingtyas, E. (1987). Pemecahan Masalah dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Jumping Task di Tinjau dari Gaya Kognitif.
Hudiono, B. (2005). Peran pembelajaran Diskursus Multi Representasi Terhadap Pengembangan Kemampuan Matematika dan Daya Representasi pada Siswa SLTP. http://digilib.upi.edu/digitalview.hp?digital_id=1110. Diakses 23 September 2014.
Ikram, M. (2013). Eksplorasi Penalaran Siswa Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Trigonometri Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Pada Siswa kelas XII-IPA (Doctoral dissertation, Tesis Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Makassar. Tidak Diterbitkan).
Ikram, M. (2017). Proses Berfikir Reflektif Mahasiswa Terkait dengan Masalah Grafik Fungsi Trigonometri. Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2).
Juliana, J., Ekawati, D., & Basir, F. (2017). Deskripsi kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal sistem persamaan linear dua variabel. Pedegogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1).
Kirkley, J. (2003). Principles for teaching problem solving. The Technical Paper, No. 4, 1-14. Plato learning.
Leron, U., & Paz, T. (2014). Functions via everyday actions: Support or obstacle?. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 36, 126-134.
Mason, J., burton, L., & Stacey, K. 2010. Thinking Mathematically Second Edition. Pearson Education Limited.
McGowen, M. A., & Tall, D. O. (2013). Flexible thinking and met-befores: Impact on learning mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 32(2), 527-537.
Miles, Mattew B. Dan A. Michael Huberman. 1992. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Method. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia (UI-PRESS).
Mimbadri, Y., Suharto, S., & Oktaviniangtyas, E. (2019). Pengembangan media pembelajaran matematika interaktif online classflow berbantuan software geogebra pada materi luas daerah. MAJAMATH: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 121-130.
Moleong, Lexy J. 2000. Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muhadjir, Noeng. 1998. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif pendekatan positivistik, Rasionalistik, Phenomenologik, dan Realisme Metaphisik, telaah studi teks dan penelitian agama. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Murdiyani, N. M., Putri, R. I. I., Eerde, D. V., & Van, F. (2013). Developing a Model to Support Students in Solving Subtraction. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.4.1.567.95-112.
Pólya, G. (2014). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.
Putri, O. R. U., & Nadlifah, M. (2021). Proses Transformasi Visual ke Simbolik Mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan Masalah Luas Daerah di Bawah Kurva. Jurnal Elemen, 7(2), 425-437.
Soesanto, R. H., & Dirgantoro, K. P. S. (2021). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Mahasiswa pada Kalkulus Integral Dilihat dari Keyakinan dan Pengetahuan Awal Matematis. Jurnal Elemen, 7(1), 117-129.
Sugiyono, D. 2013. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D.
Sumartini, T.S. 2016. Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika STKIP Garut. Vol 8(3): 14. (Online). (http://jurnalmtk.stkipgarut.ac.id/data/edisi8/vol3/Tina.pdf. Diakses 19 Januari 2017).
Suryaningtyas, S., & Setyaningrum, W. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Metakognitif Siswa SMA Kelas XI Program IPA dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika,7(1), 74-87.
Wafiqoh, R., Darmawijoyo, D., & Hartono, Y. (2016). LKS Berbasis Model Eliciting Activities untuk Mengetahui Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika di Kelas VIII. Jurnal Elemen, 2(1), 39-55.
Wiyanti, W. (2017). Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Matematis Mahasiswa Papua Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Luas Daerah Di Bawah Kurva Normal. Jurnal Derivat: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 24-30.
Yimer, A., & Ellerton, N. F. (2010). A five-phase Model for Mathematical Problem Solving: Identifying Synergies in Pre-Service-Teachers’ Metacognitive and Cognitive Actions. ZDM Mathematic Education.
Zetriuslita, Z. (2016). Profil sikap ilmiah rasa ingin tahu (curiosity) matematika mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (JIP) STKIP Kusuma Negara, 8(1),41-46.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nur Azizah, Salwah Salwah, Muhammad Ikram
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors certify that:
- if the manuscript is co-authored, they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- the work described has not been formally published before in a registered ISSN or ISBN media, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis.
- it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- they secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere (it does not infringe on the rights of others).
- they agree to the license and copyright agreement.
All articles published are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
- Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
